| Case Information
| Year |
Page# |
Paragraph 20(1)(b) |
| The Less formal the
Better |
(Commercial Information- Confidential)
Canada Customs and Revenue Agency |
1993-1994 |
49 |
| |
| Inspecting Inspectors'
Minutes |
(Financial information- Confidential)
Industry Canada |
1993-1994 |
50 |
| |
| Modest Proposals |
(Financial information- Commercial information- Confidential)
Transport Canada |
1993-1994 |
54 |
| |
| The Art of Appraising Art |
(Financial information- Confidential)
Canadian Cultural Property Export Review Board |
1994-1995 |
31 |
| |
| Transparent Bidding |
(Financial information- Confidential)
Public Works and Government Services Canada |
1997-1998 |
63 |
| |
| Pan-Pan-Pan |
(Technical information- Confidential)
Transportation Safety Board |
1998-1999 |
43 |
| |
| Discharging
the Burden |
(Commercial information- Confidential)
National Defence |
2000-2001 |
94 |
| |
| Assessing
Environmental Impact of CANDU Reactors |
(Commercial information- Confidential)
Natural Resources Canada |
2001-2002 |
46 |
| |
| How Much
was Repaid? |
(Financial information- Commercial information- Confidential)
Industry Canada |
2003-2004 |
46 |
| |
Paragraph 20(1)(c) |
| The Less formal the
Better |
(Could reasonably be expected- Material financial loss or gain)
Canada Customs and Revenue Agency |
1993-1994 |
49 |
| |
| Modest Proposals |
(Could reasonably be expected- Material financial loss or gain-
Prejudice to competitive position)
Transport Canada |
1993-1994 |
54 |
| |
| Whose Videotapes Are
They? |
(Could reasonably be expected- Material financial loss or gain)
Environment Canada |
1995-1996 |
53 |
| |
| Third Party Motives |
(Could reasonably be expected- Prejudice to competitive position)
Public Works and Government Services |
1995-1996 |
62 |
| |
| Transparent Bidding |
(Could reasonably be expected- Prejudice to competitive position)
Public Works and Government Services Canada |
1997-1998 |
63 |
| |
| Pan-Pan-Pan |
(Could reasonably be expected- Prejudice to competitive position)
Transportation Safety Board |
1998-1999 |
43 |
| |
| Discharging
the Burden |
(Could reasonably be expected- Material financial loss or gain-
Prejudice to competitive position)
National Defence |
2000-2001 |
94 |
| |
| Assessing
Environmental Impact of CANDU Reactors |
(Could reasonably be expected- Material financial loss or gain-
Prejudice to competitive position)
Natural Resources Canada |
2001-2002 |
46 |
| |
| The
Collection of Duties on International Mail |
(Could reasonably be expected- Prejudice to competitive position)
Canada Customs and Revenue Agency |
2001-2002 |
48 |
| |
| Were Loans
Repaid? |
(Could reasonably be expected- Prejudice to competitive position)
Canada Economic Development for the Quebec Region |
2002-2003 |
73 |
| |
| How Much
Was Repaid? |
(Could reasonably be expected- Prejudice to competitive position)
Industry Canada |
2003-2004 |
27 |
| |
Paragraph 20(1)(d) |
| Modest Proposals |
(Could reasonably be expected- Contractual or other negotiations)
Transport Canada |
1993-1994 |
54 |
| |
| Third Party Motives |
(Could reasonably be expected- Contractual or other negotiations)
Public Works and Government Services Canada |
1997-1998 |
62 |
| |
| Assessing
Environmental Impact of CANDU Reactors |
(Could reasonably be expected- Contractual or other negotiations)
Natural Resources Canada |
2001-2002 |
46 |
| |
Subsection 20(2) |
| Whose Videotapes Are
They? |
(Product or environment testing)
Environment Canada |
1995-1996 |
53 |
| |
Subsection 20(6) |
| Weighing Public Interest |
(Public interest- Clearly outweighs in importance- Financial loss-
Prejudice to competitive position)
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada |
1993-1994 |
50 |
| |
| Whose Videotapes Are
They? |
(Public interest- Clearly outweighs in importance- Financial loss)
Environment Canada |
1995-1996 |
53 |
| |
| Discharging
the Burden |
(Public interest- In the public interest as it relates to public heatlh,
safety, or protection of the environment- Clearly outweighs in importance-
Financial loss)
National Defence |
2000-2001 |
94 |
| |
|
Confidentiality Versus Public Interest |
(Public interest- In the public interest as it relates to
public heatlh, safety, or protection of the environment- Clearly outweighs in
importance- Financial loss)
Canada Institute of Health Research |
2003-2004 |
36 |
